Arzan Financial Group

شركة مجموعة أرزان المالية
B RatingFinancial ServicesPremier Market Financial Services2025 AssessmentB (stable)
arzan.com.kwMSM v2.1· 154 Criteria
B
Mnakh Rating
48.5
/ 100
Environmental20%
3.00
30% achievement · 4 subcategories
-0.90 vs 2024
Contributes 6 / 20
Social30%
4.75
48% achievement · 5 subcategories
-1.45 vs 2024
Contributes 14.25 / 30
Governance50%
5.65
57% achievement · 5 subcategories
-0.55 vs 2024
Contributes 28.25 / 50
B · 48.5
CC
0–29.99
CCC
30–39.99
B
40–49.99
BB
50–59.99
BBB
60–69.99
A
70–79.99
AA
80–89.99
AAA
90–100
Sector Rank
#18 / 21
/ 21 · Financial Services
Overall Rank
#29
of 46 assessed
Strongest Pillar
G 5.65
Governance · 57%
R&C Deduction
0.00
No controversies
Sector Peers — Financial ServicesTop 5 of 21
1
National Bank of Kuwait
87.8
AA+
2
Kuwait Finance House
82.7
AA
3
Burgan Bank
82.3
AA
4
Boursa Kuwait
81.9
AA
5
Boubyan Bank
80.2
AA
Key Findings

Executive Summary

Arzan Financial Group's 2025 ESG performance shows a clear divergence between weaker environmental disclosure and stronger social and governance practices. Environmentally, AFG reports multi-year electricity and water consumption with documented efficiency and recycling programs but discloses no GHG emissions data, no intensity metrics, no renewables deployment, and no climate (TCFD) framework. Socially, the company provides quantified charitable investment with SDG alignment, gender and Kuwaitization workforce data, 25 training hours per employee, and a universal supplier code of conduct, though it lacks occupational safety metrics, beneficiary outcomes, and ESG contract clauses. Governance is the strongest pillar, anchored by CMA regulatory compliance with zero reported breaches, Internal Audit and Board Audit Committee oversight, a structured GRI-referenced report with materiality assessment, and ESG integration across investment processes. Key constraints across all pillars are the absence of external assurance, low board independence (~29%), apparent absence of female directors, and numerous GRI disclosures marked N/A or deferred to internal reports.

Year-over-Year Analysis

vs 2024

AFG's ESG trajectory in 2025 is broadly stable with modest shifts within pillars rather than dramatic swings. The Environmental pillar remains the weakest area and shows little improvement, constrained by the continued absence of any GHG emissions data despite maintaining multi-year energy and water reporting. The Social and Governance pillars continue to perform at solid mid-tier levels, supported by quantified community investment, workforce diversity data, training disclosure, regulatory compliance with zero breaches, and a structured ESG report. No material regressions were identified; the principal limiting factors remain the lack of external assurance, climate-risk frameworks, occupational safety metrics, and numerous N/A GRI disclosures.

Environmental

The Environmental pillar remained the weakest and showed minimal year-over-year change, with continued multi-year energy (E2) and water (E4) reporting and efficiency/recycling programs, but persistent gaps in GHG emissions data (E1 still at minimal disclosure) and only a slight strengthening in environmental risk integration (E3) within the broader risk framework.

Social

The Social pillar held steady at solid mid-tier levels, with quantified charitable investment and SDG alignment (S1), gender and Kuwaitization data (S3), 25 training hours per employee (S4), and a universal supplier code of conduct (S5); the persistent weakness remains occupational safety, where all GRI 403 disclosures are still N/A (S2).

Governance

The Governance pillar remained the strongest area with continued strong regulatory compliance and zero reported breaches (G2), a structured GRI-referenced report with materiality (G1), and ESG integration across investment processes (G3), though low board independence and apparent absence of female directors continue to constrain G4.

Key Improvements
G1: Structured GRI-referenced report with 15-topic materiality and stakeholder engagement — AFG's second annual Sustainability & ESG Report uses GRI 1: Foundation 2021 with a full content index, a 15-topic materiality matrix, and documented stakeholder consultation across employees, customers, suppliers, investors, community, and regulators.
G2: Compliance framework reinforced with zero reported breaches and 100% risk-mitigation implementation — AFG reports compliance with CMA bylaws, Environmental Protection Law No. 42 of 2014, and Kuwaitization, with Internal Audit and Board Audit Committee oversight and a 100% implementation rate of risk-mitigation plans with zero incidents.
E3: Environmental risk integration into risk-management framework strengthened — AFG embeds ESG and environmental regulation considerations into its risk framework and has departments assessing legal risks on emissions, waste, and resource conservation, with a stated plan to formally measure sustainability risks next year.
Key Regressions
E1: GHG emissions data remains entirely absent with all GRI 305 disclosures marked N/A — No Scope 1, 2, or 3 emissions, intensity, or reduction data is disclosed; the only carbon figure is a vendor product claim, representing a continued data-quality gap rather than a score decline.
S2: Occupational safety metrics still undisclosed with all GRI 403 disclosures N/A — AFG reports satisfaction and turnover but discloses no LTIFR, TRIR, injury, or fatality data and no OHS management system, a persistent reporting boundary gap.
Outlook

AFG is positioned to improve if it begins disclosing GHG emissions, adopts a climate/TCFD framework, populates currently N/A GRI disclosures, and obtains external assurance. Continued strength in regulatory compliance and governance provides a stable foundation, but environmental and safety data gaps must close to lift the overall rating.

Strengths

Strong regulatory compliance framework (CMA bylaws, Environmental Protection Law No. 42 of 2014, Kuwaitization) with Internal Audit and Board Audit Committee oversight and zero reported breaches/100% risk-mitigation implementation
Structured standalone GRI-referenced sustainability report with a 15-topic materiality assessment, stakeholder engagement, and SDG/Boursa/Kuwait Vision 2035 alignment
ESG integration across investment, credit, and asset valuation processes with ~$13.75M environment-related investment over three years, plus 100% supplier code-of-conduct signing and 25 training hours per employee

Areas for Improvement

Establish a GHG inventory (Scope 1, 2, 3) with emission intensity metrics, quantified reduction targets, and a climate/TCFD framework with scenario analysis — currently all GRI 305 disclosures are N/A
Disclose occupational health and safety metrics (LTIFR, TRIR, injury/fatality rates) and a formal OHS management system, as all GRI 403 disclosures are N/A
Obtain external/limited assurance on ESG data, improve report quality (remove placeholder text, populate N/A disclosures), strengthen board independence above 33%, and add female directors
Performance Overview
Subcategory Radar
14subcategories · 0–10
E1E2E3E4S1S2S3S4S5G1G2G3G4G5
20252024
Pillar Contribution
of 48.50 total
48.5
Total
Environmental
6 / 20 · 12.4%
Social
14.25 / 30 · 29.4%
Governance
28.25 / 50 · 58.2%
Subcategory Treemap
Size = weight · Color = pillar
G16
Transparency & ESG · W:15
G26.5
Compliance with ESG · W:10
G35.3
Sustainable Finance & · W:10
G45
Board Diversity & · W:10
S15
Community Investment & · W:9
S35
Diversity, Inclusion & · W:9
E11.5
Carbon Emissions Reduction · W:8
E24.5
Energy Efficiency & · W:6
S23.5
Workplace Well-being & · W:6
G55
Ethics & Anti-Corruption · W:5
E33
Climate Change Adaptation · W:4
S45.3
Education & Sustainability · W:3
S55.3
Sustainable Supply Chain · W:3
E44.5
Water & Waste · W:2
Pillar Details
3.00
out of 10
Achievement30%
Contribution6 / 20
Weight20%
Subcategories4
E1
Carbon Emissions Reduction
1.5
-0.5 vs 2024
/10
Weight: 8
15% achievement
E2
Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy
4.5
-1.5 vs 2024
/10
Weight: 6
45% achievement
E3
Climate Change Adaptation
3
-2.0 vs 2024
/10
Weight: 4
30% achievement
E4
Water & Waste Management
4.5
▲+0.5 vs 2024
/10
Weight: 2
45% achievement
Score Calculation
1
Pillar Scores
E: 3.00
S: 4.75
G: 5.65
Weighted averages (0\u201310)
2
Apply Weights
48.50
(3.00×2)+(4.75×3)+(5.65×5)
E:20% S:30% G:50%
3
R&C Deduction
0.00
No controversies
4
Final Score
48.50
Range: 40–49.99
Rating
B
Mnakh Index Rating
ESG Activities
Activity Summary
1 activities in 2026
Environmental
0
Social
1
Governance
0

Recent Activities

View all →
SS127 Jul 2026

Arzan Supports Kuwait Emergency Response Fund for National Preparedness

Arzan Financial Group announced a contribution of USD 1 million to the Kuwait Emergency Response Fund, established by the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development to strengthen the state's readiness to respond to emergency conditions arising from regional geopolitical developments. Arzan stated that the contribution supports continuity of essential services and critical infrastructure and reflects private sector participation in national preparedness efforts. The announcement does not specify how the funds will be allocated or a project-level implementation timeline.

USD 1,000,000 Contribution amount
Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development
Methodology: MSM v2.1 · 154 CriteriaAssessment: 2025Weights: E:20% · S:30% · G:50%