Combined Group Contracting

المجموعة المشتركة للمقاولات
CCC RatingIndustrial ManufacturingPremier Market Industrials2025 Assessment
http://www.cgc-kw.comMSM v2.1· 154 Criteria
39.5First Assessment2025
CCC
Mnakh Rating
39.5
/ 100
Environmental45%
3.40
34% achievement · 4 subcategories
Contributes 15.3 / 45
Social25%
4.90
49% achievement · 5 subcategories
Contributes 12.25 / 25
Governance30%
4.00
40% achievement · 5 subcategories
Contributes 12 / 30
CCC · 39.5
CC
0–29.99
CCC
30–39.99
B
40–49.99
BB
50–59.99
BBB
60–69.99
A
70–79.99
AA
80–89.99
AAA
90–100
Sector Rank
#5 / 7
/ 7 · Industrial Manufacturing
Overall Rank
#42
of 46 assessed
Strongest Pillar
S 4.90
Social · 49%
R&C Deduction
0.00
No controversies
Sector Peers — Industrial ManufacturingTop 5 of 7
1
Gulf Cables and Electrical Industries
67.8
BBB
2
Integrated Holding
65.3
BBB
3
Human Soft Holding
55.3
B
4
Shuaiba Industrial
46.9
B
5
Combined Group Contracting
39.5
CCC
Key Findings

Executive Summary

Combined Group Contracting's first standalone ESG report demonstrates strong, externally certified occupational health and safety performance (ISO 45001, zero fatalities, multiple external safety awards), which is its clear standout pillar and particularly material for a construction/contracting business. Environmental disclosure is at an early stage: the company reports detailed single-year energy, fuel, water, and waste activity data and holds ISO 14001 certification, but it does not convert energy data into a GHG inventory, set reduction targets, or address climate risk via TCFD or scenario analysis. Governance shows a solid regulatory-compliance foundation (CMA/Boursa alignment, four ISO certifications, zero violations, full committee structure) but is held back by limited board independence (~22%), no valid 2025 female board representation, and the absence of formal ethics infrastructure such as a code of conduct, anti-corruption policy, or whistleblowing mechanism. Social performance beyond safety is moderate, with extensive training/awareness activity and several SDG-linked community programs, but no monetary investment data, demographic breakdowns, or impact measurement. Overall, the company has built a credible operational and compliance base but needs to mature its disclosure with quantified targets, formal policies, and independent assurance.

Strengths

Externally certified occupational health and safety excellence: ISO 45001:2018 certification, zero fatalities, full safety metrics (LTIR 0.089), 2 million working hours without LTI, and multiple external safety awards (International Safety Award 2025, KOC recognition).
Strong regulatory-compliance and quality foundation: alignment with CMA and Boursa Kuwait Disclosure Guidelines, four ISO certifications (9001, 14001, 45001, 17025), and zero environmental violations and customer complaints.
Substantial training and awareness activity (11,228 training hours, 2,514 sessions, 373 awareness campaigns) covering environmental/sustainability, OHS, and human rights content.

Areas for Improvement

Develop a formal GHG emissions inventory: convert reported energy/fuel data into Scope 1 and 2 CO2e, set quantified reduction targets, and pursue external assurance.
Build climate-risk governance: adopt TCFD-aligned disclosure, conduct physical/transition risk and scenario analysis, and link climate to the existing Risk Committee.
Strengthen governance and ethics infrastructure: increase board independence above 25%, ensure valid female board representation, and establish a formal code of conduct, anti-corruption policy, and whistleblowing mechanism.
Performance Overview
Subcategory Radar
14subcategories · 0–10
E1E2E3E4S1S2S3S4S5G1G2G3G4G5
Pillar Contribution
of 39.55 total
39.5
Total
Environmental
15.3 / 45 · 38.7%
Social
12.25 / 25 · 31.0%
Governance
12 / 30 · 30.3%
Subcategory Treemap
Size = weight · Color = pillar
E13
Carbon Emissions Reduction · W:18
E24.5
Energy Efficiency & · W:13.5
E32
Climate Change Adaptation · W:9
G14.5
Transparency & ESG · W:9
S14.5
Community Investment & · W:7.5
S33.5
Diversity, Inclusion & · W:7.5
G26
Compliance with ESG · W:6
G31.5
Sustainable Finance & · W:6
G44.5
Board Diversity & · W:6
S28.5
Workplace Well-being & · W:5
E44.5
Water & Waste · W:4.5
G52.5
Ethics & Anti-Corruption · W:3
S45.5
Education & Sustainability · W:2.5
S52.5
Sustainable Supply Chain · W:2.5
Pillar Details
3.40
out of 10
Achievement34%
Contribution15.3 / 45
Weight45%
Subcategories4
E1
Carbon Emissions Reduction
3
/10
Weight: 18
30% achievement
E2
Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy
4.5
/10
Weight: 13.5
45% achievement
E3
Climate Change Adaptation
2
/10
Weight: 9
20% achievement
E4
Water & Waste Management
4.5
/10
Weight: 4.5
45% achievement
Score Calculation
1
Pillar Scores
E: 3.40
S: 4.90
G: 4.00
Weighted averages (0\u201310)
2
Apply Weights
39.55
(3.40×4.5)+(4.90×2.5)+(4.00×3)
E:45% S:25% G:30%
3
R&C Deduction
0.00
No controversies
4
Final Score
39.55
Range: 30–39.99
Rating
CCC
Mnakh Index Rating
ESG Activities
Activity Summary
1 activities in 2026
Environmental
0
Social
1
Governance
0

Recent Activities

View all →
SS129 Jul 2026

CGC Donates USD 1 Million to Kuwait Emergency Response Fund

Combined Group Contracting (CGC) contributed USD 1 million to the Kuwait Emergency Response Fund, established by the Kuwait Fund for Development following Cabinet approval to strengthen national emergency preparedness and crisis response capacity. The Kuwait Fund for Development announced on 30 July 2026 that this was the first contribution to the fund from the contracting sector. The fund itself was launched on 5 July 2026 and is administered and supervised by the Kuwait Fund for Development.

USD 1,000,000 Contribution amountFirst contribution from Kuwait's contracting sector Sector ranking5 July 2026 Fund launch date
Kuwait Fund for Development, Kuwait Emergency Response Fund
Methodology: MSM v2.1 · 154 CriteriaAssessment: 2025Weights: E:45% · S:25% · G:30%