Heavy Engineering Industries

شركة الصناعات الهندسية الثقيلة وبناء السفن
CCC RatingIndustrial ManufacturingPremier Market Industrials2025 AssessmentCCCC
www.heisco.comMSM v2.1· 154 Criteria
CCC
Mnakh Rating
38.9
/ 100
Environmental45%
2.90
29% achievement · 4 subcategories
2023: 2.90
Contributes 13.05 / 45
Social25%
5.10
51% achievement · 5 subcategories
▲+0.50 vs 2023
Contributes 12.75 / 25
Governance30%
4.35
44% achievement · 5 subcategories
-0.55 vs 2023
Contributes 13.05 / 30
CCC · 38.9
CC
0–29.99
CCC
30–39.99
B
40–49.99
BB
50–59.99
BBB
60–69.99
A
70–79.99
AA
80–89.99
AAA
90–100
Sector Rank
#6 / 7
/ 7 · Industrial Manufacturing
Overall Rank
#43
of 46 assessed
Strongest Pillar
S 5.10
Social · 51%
R&C Deduction
0.00
No controversies
Sector Peers — Industrial ManufacturingTop 5 of 7
1
Gulf Cables and Electrical Industries
67.8
BBB
2
Integrated Holding
65.3
BBB
3
Human Soft Holding
55.3
B
4
Shuaiba Industrial
46.9
B
5
Combined Group Contracting
39.5
CCC
Key Findings

Executive Summary

HEISCO (Heavy Engineering Industries Co) demonstrates a foundational-to-developing ESG profile consistent with a company in its second year of structured sustainability reporting. Governance and social pillars show relative strength, with a well-structured compliance framework, comprehensive ethics policy architecture, community investment programs, and externally recognised health and safety excellence (ASSP Gold and Platinum awards), while the environmental pillar remains the most material gap area. The company's environmental disclosure is constrained by the complete absence of GHG emissions data across all scopes, no climate risk framework, and a lack of quantitative waste management data, though multi-year water and electricity consumption trends with meaningful reductions (~9-10% year-over-year) indicate operational efficiency progress. Governance is solid at the policy and compliance level — with zero violations, zero corruption incidents, and multi-regulatory alignment — but structural limitations including 20% board independence and zero female board representation require attention. Overall, HEISCO shows genuine ESG commitment through its sustainability report, ISO 14001 certification, and operational efficiency improvements, but must materially advance its GHG emissions measurement, climate risk disclosure, and gender inclusion to meet evolving stakeholder expectations.

Strengths

Externally recognised HSE excellence: HEISCO received ASSP GCC HSE Excellence Gold and Platinum Awards in 2024 and was shortlisted for the Maritime Standard Awards 2025 Safety and Security Award, providing credible third-party validation of safety culture beyond policy disclosure.
Comprehensive ethics and compliance framework: A well-developed policy architecture including Code of Conduct, Conflict of Interest Policy with register, Whistleblowing Policy with stakeholder protection, Related Party Transactions Policy, and zero recorded corruption incidents demonstrates institutional ethics maturity supported by multi-regulatory compliance (CMA, Boursa Kuwait, Kuwait Stock Exchange).
Operational resource efficiency and community investment: Multi-year electricity (~9% reduction) and water (~10% reduction) consumption trends demonstrate measurable operational efficiency progress, complemented by quantified community investment of KD 49,500 across seven named programs and substantial statutory contributions (Zakat, National Labor Support Tax, KFAS) totalling over KD 600,000 across the reporting period.

Areas for Improvement

GHG emissions measurement and climate risk disclosure (E1, E3): HEISCO discloses zero quantitative GHG data across Scope 1, 2, and 3, and has no TCFD-aligned climate risk framework, scenario analysis, or physical/transition risk identification — representing the most material gap relative to evolving ESG disclosure standards and investor expectations.
Gender diversity and inclusion (S3, S4, G4): Women represent only 1.44% of senior management, zero females received training across all three reporting years, the board is 100% male, and no formal diversity targets or pay equity analysis are disclosed — indicating systemic gender inclusion gaps that require dedicated policy commitments and measurable targets.
Waste management quantification and energy intensity metrics (E2, E4): Waste management disclosure is entirely qualitative with no tonnage, diversion rates, recycling percentages, or hazardous waste data; energy disclosure lacks specified units and formal intensity metrics; and neither pillar has quantified reduction targets with timelines, limiting the credibility and benchmarkability of environmental performance claims.
Performance Overview
Subcategory Radar
14subcategories · 0–10
E1E2E3E4S1S2S3S4S5G1G2G3G4G5
20252023
Pillar Contribution
of 38.85 total
38.9
Total
Environmental
13.05 / 45 · 33.6%
Social
12.75 / 25 · 32.8%
Governance
13.05 / 30 · 33.6%
Subcategory Treemap
Size = weight · Color = pillar
E11.5
Carbon Emissions Reduction · W:18
E25
Energy Efficiency & · W:13.5
E32
Climate Change Adaptation · W:9
G15
Transparency & ESG · W:9
S15.5
Community Investment & · W:7.5
S34.5
Diversity, Inclusion & · W:7.5
G25.5
Compliance with ESG · W:6
G31.5
Sustainable Finance & · W:6
G44.5
Board Diversity & · W:6
S25.5
Workplace Well-being & · W:5
E44
Water & Waste · W:4.5
G55.5
Ethics & Anti-Corruption · W:3
S45
Education & Sustainability · W:2.5
S55
Sustainable Supply Chain · W:2.5
Pillar Details
2.90
out of 10
Achievement29%
Contribution13.05 / 45
Weight45%
Subcategories4
E1
Carbon Emissions Reduction
1.5
-0.5 vs 2023
/10
Weight: 18
15% achievement
E2
Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy
5
▲+1.0 vs 2023
/10
Weight: 13.5
50% achievement
E3
Climate Change Adaptation
2
-1.0 vs 2023
/10
Weight: 9
20% achievement
E4
Water & Waste Management
4
2023: 4
/10
Weight: 4.5
40% achievement
Score Calculation
1
Pillar Scores
E: 2.90
S: 5.10
G: 4.35
Weighted averages (0\u201310)
2
Apply Weights
38.85
(2.90×4.5)+(5.10×2.5)+(4.35×3)
E:45% S:25% G:30%
3
R&C Deduction
0.00
No controversies
4
Final Score
38.85
Range: 30–39.99
Rating
CCC
Mnakh Index Rating
ESG Activities
Activity Summary
1 activities in 2026
Environmental
0
Social
1
Governance
0

Recent Activities

View all →
SS14 Aug 2026

HESICO Supports Kuwait Emergency Response Fund with Cash and In-Kind Aid

Heavy Engineering Industries (HESICO) announced a total contribution of USD 2 million to the Kuwait Emergency Response Fund, established under Cabinet Decision No. 587, in response to an invitation from the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development. The contribution comprises USD 1 million in cash and USD 1 million in-kind support in the form of construction and marine equipment, machinery and logistics services made available to state entities in affected sectors. HESICO stated the aim is to support national rehabilitation works and the continuity of vital services and facilities. The announcement does not state a specific date.

USD 2,000,000 Total contributionUSD 1,000,000 Cash contributionUSD 1,000,000 In-kind contribution (equipment, machinery, logistics)
Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development, Kuwait Emergency Response Fund
Methodology: MSM v2.1 · 154 CriteriaAssessment: 2025Weights: E:45% · S:25% · G:30%