United Real Estate

شركة العقارات المتحدة
BB RatingReal Estate & ConstructionPremier Market Real Estate2025 AssessmentBBBBB
www.urc.com.kwMSM v2.1· 154 Criteria
BB
Mnakh Rating
58.3
/ 100
Environmental40%
4.94
49% achievement · 4 subcategories
-1.41 vs 2024
Contributes 19.76 / 40
Social30%
6.38
64% achievement · 5 subcategories
-1.07 vs 2024
Contributes 19.14 / 30
Governance30%
6.47
65% achievement · 5 subcategories
-0.58 vs 2024
Contributes 19.41 / 30
BB · 58.3
CC
0–29.99
CCC
30–39.99
B
40–49.99
BB
50–59.99
BBB
60–69.99
A
70–79.99
AA
80–89.99
AAA
90–100
Sector Rank
#3 / 6
/ 6 · Real Estate & Construction
Overall Rank
#20
of 46 assessed
Strongest Pillar
G 6.47
Governance · 65%
R&C Deduction
0.00
No controversies
Sector Peers — Real Estate & ConstructionTop 5 of 6
1
Mabanee
77.7
A+
2
The Commercial Real Estate
70.0
BBB
3
United Real Estate
67.4
BBB
4
Kuwait Real Estate
54.2
BB
5
Salhia Real Estate
44.5
B
Key Findings

Executive Summary

United Real Estate demonstrates a maturing ESG profile with particular strength in governance and social performance. Governance is anchored by CMA regulatory oversight, a comprehensive ethics and anti-corruption framework with anonymous whistleblowing, four functioning board committees with annual evaluations, and zero reported violations. Social performance is strong, featuring a zero-harm safety record with 100% OHS coverage, robust diversity disclosure with a documented quarterly-monitored pay equity analysis, and comprehensive ESG-integrated training programs. Environmental disclosure is comprehensive for a first/second-year reporter — detailed Scope 1 and 2 inventories, energy and water data, and climate risk identification — but is held back by the absence of Scope 3 data, multi-year trends, quantified reduction targets, green building certifications, and external assurance. The clearest development gaps are sustainable finance (no green instruments disclosed) and board independence (29%, below the 33% threshold).

Year-over-Year Analysis

vs 2024

URC's ESG profile in 2025 reflects a maturing second-year reporting cycle with strengthened quantitative disclosure across all three pillars. The Environmental pillar advanced through first detailed Scope 1 and 2 inventories, energy mix breakdowns, and climate risk identification, though it remains constrained by missing Scope 3, targets, and assurance. Social performance held strong with deepened pay equity analysis showing a 9.46% YoY improvement and sustained zero-harm safety, while Governance remained robust with continued CMA compliance and a comprehensive ethics framework. No material regressions were identified, though the lack of external assurance and undeveloped sustainable finance remain persistent gaps. The trajectory is one of steady, evidence-backed maturation rather than dramatic change.

Environmental

The Environmental pillar strengthened through the introduction of detailed Scope 1 and 2 GHG inventories with disclosed methodology, energy mix breakdowns, and structured climate risk identification within an ISO 31000 framework. However, persistent gaps in Scope 3 reporting, multi-year trends, quantified targets, and external assurance limited the magnitude of improvement.

Social

The Social pillar remained strong and improved in diversity disclosure, notably a documented pay equity analysis showing the women-to-men salary ratio rising with a 9.46% increase since 2024, alongside a sustained zero-harm safety record and comprehensive ESG-integrated training. Community engagement remained activity-rich but still lacks monetary investment and impact measurement.

Governance

Governance scores remained stable YoY, with continued strong performance in CMA/Boursa Kuwait compliance, a comprehensive ethics and whistleblowing framework, and structured annual board evaluations. Board independence at 29% and the absence of sustainable finance instruments and external assurance continue to cap further governance gains.

Key Improvements
E1: First detailed Scope 1 and 2 GHG inventory with disclosed methodology — URC quantified Scope 1 (12,207.58 tCO2e) and Scope 2 (96,654.92 tCO2e) using the GHG Protocol operational control approach with DEFRA 2025 and Kuwait-specific CarbonDI factors, establishing an emissions baseline for the first time.
S3: Documented pay equity analysis with measurable YoY improvement — URC disclosed an 81% women-to-men salary ratio with a 9.46% improvement since 2024 monitored quarterly, alongside near-30% female board representation and WEPs/KWEEP signatory status.
E3: Structured climate risk identification and Board-level governance introduced — URC identified specific physical and transition risks (extreme heat, cooling continuity, water scarcity) within an ISO 31000-aligned enterprise risk framework with ESG Committee and Board Risk Management Committee oversight.
Key Regressions
G1: Report remains without external assurance despite framework breadth — The 2025 sustainability report underwent internal review only with no third-party assurance, a reporting-quality limitation that persists from prior reporting and caps governance disclosure scores.
Outlook

URC is on a steady upward ESG trajectory, and adding quantified reduction targets, external assurance, and sustainable finance instruments would unlock the next tier of scoring. Strengthening board independence above the 33% threshold and pursuing safety/ethics certifications (ISO 45001, ISO 37001) would further consolidate its governance and social leadership.

Strengths

Comprehensive ethics and anti-corruption framework with anonymous whistleblowing, Board Audit Committee oversight, and zero reported corruption cases (G5)
Strong social performance: zero-harm safety record with 100% OHS coverage plus documented quarterly-monitored pay equity analysis (81% ratio, 9.46% YoY improvement) and WEPs signatory status (S2, S3)
Robust regulatory compliance and reporting: CMA/Boursa Kuwait alignment with 100% compliance, GRI-referenced standalone report with double materiality and full content indices (G1, G2)

Areas for Improvement

Sustainable finance is undeveloped — no green bonds, green Sukuk, or ESG-linked instruments disclosed, and climate investment figures unavailable (G3)
Environmental targets and assurance gaps — no Scope 3, multi-year trends, quantified reduction targets, green building certifications, or external assurance (E1, E2, E4)
Board independence at 29% remains below the 33% threshold, and no third-party board evaluation or formal skills matrix is disclosed (G4)
Performance Overview
Subcategory Radar
14subcategories · 0–10
E1E2E3E4S1S2S3S4S5G1G2G3G4G5
20252024
Pillar Contribution
of 58.31 total
58.3
Total
Environmental
19.76 / 40 · 33.9%
Social
19.14 / 30 · 32.8%
Governance
19.41 / 30 · 33.3%
Subcategory Treemap
Size = weight · Color = pillar
E14.5
Carbon Emissions Reduction · W:15
E25
Energy Efficiency & · W:10
E35.5
Climate Change Adaptation · W:10
S15
Community Investment & · W:10
G17
Transparency & ESG · W:10
S27.5
Workplace Well-being & · W:7
S38
Diversity, Inclusion & · W:7
G27
Compliance with ESG · W:7
S55.5
Sustainable Supply Chain · W:6
G46.5
Board Diversity & · W:6
E45
Water & Waste · W:5
G33
Sustainable Finance & · W:4
G58
Ethics & Anti-Corruption · W:3
Pillar Details
4.94
out of 10
Achievement49%
Contribution19.76 / 40
Weight40%
Subcategories4
E1
Carbon Emissions Reduction
4.5
-0.5 vs 2024
/10
Weight: 15
45% achievement
E2
Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy
5
-3.0 vs 2024
/10
Weight: 10
50% achievement
E3
Climate Change Adaptation
5.5
-1.5 vs 2024
/10
Weight: 10
55% achievement
E4
Water & Waste Management
5
-1.5 vs 2024
/10
Weight: 5
50% achievement
Score Calculation
1
Pillar Scores
E: 4.94
S: 6.38
G: 6.47
Weighted averages (0\u201310)
2
Apply Weights
58.31
(4.94×4)+(6.38×3)+(6.47×3)
E:40% S:30% G:30%
3
R&C Deduction
0.00
No controversies
4
Final Score
58.31
Range: 50–59.99
Rating
BB
Mnakh Index Rating
ESG Activities
Activity Summary
1 activities in 2026
Environmental
0
Social
0
Governance
1

Recent Activities

View all →
GG46 May 2026

URC Holds Annual General Meeting for FY2025

United Real Estate Co (URC) held its Annual General Meeting for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025, on May 6, 2026, in Kuwait City. The meeting achieved a quorum of 85.05%, and shareholders approved all agenda items, including the Board of Directors' recommendation to distribute 3% bonus shares from treasury shares.

85.05% Quorum achieved3% from treasury shares Bonus shares approved
Methodology: MSM v2.1 · 154 CriteriaAssessment: 2025Weights: E:40% · S:30% · G:30%